The Scottish independence referendum was a triumph of political participation. But where do we go from here?

(Originally published on Clarity News)

The Scottish referendum on independence from the United Kingdom broke records last week with an average voter turnout of 84.6% – in some constituencies, turnout was higher than 90%.

Contrast this with the turnout figures for the last General Election across the United Kingdom, which stands at a measly 65.1%, or the last Scottish parliament election, which only just reached 50%. Over 97% of the eligible population registered to vote in last week’s referendum – such engagement with politics has been unheard-of in recent years.

Since Thursday, the numbers of people joining political parties in Scotland has skyrocketed, with the SNP now the UK’s third largest political party (by membership) after the Tories and Labour; and the Scottish Greens more than doubling their membership in less than a week. It is clear that this does not mean the end of political engagement for many of Scotland’s electorate.

Despite the above figures, political engagement with the independence referendum in Scotland was always about more than political parties: one of the reasons for the high turnout compared to recent elections was precisely because this referendum was not an election.

If there is one thing that the ‘Yes’ campaign’s late surge in the polls, and indeed its two-year rise from 25% to 45% in the polls, proves, it is that engaging people in politics in twenty-first century austerity Britain is not something that can be done by top-down establishment tactics that we’ve seen in Westminster for many years now. True engagement with politics happens on the doorstep, and it happens when people really believe that they can make a difference in their future. This is true for those who voted ‘No’ as well – people believed that this vote was an important one to show up for because they believed it would actually make a difference. The significance of this cannot be understated.

The independence referendum is over, at least this time around. But a question of equal, if different, importance remains – how do we take the engagement with politics that we’ve seen in Scotland over the last two years, and spread it throughout the UK? How do we engage the most marginalised communities by giving them a real voice in their own future?

A divisive starting-point is not the right way forward. Divide-and-rule is a tried and tested tactic that the establishment have used for decades to keep dissent from spilling over. Since the Tory-Lib Dem coalition government was formed in 2010, it’s been most prevalent in the governments’ rhetoric of “strivers and scroungers” and the rise of anti-immigration sentiment from right-wing groups such as UKIP. This creates divisions amongst people equally affected by the hard-hitting austerity forced upon them. It distracts from the fact that the ones making the laws are members of a wealthy political elite who can retreat to their expenses-funded second homes whilst demonising the poor as the cause of the problem the bankers created.

We have seen murmurings of this even since the referendum, as well: the West Lothian question and devolution in England has been touted as the reason for postponing the promised further powers for Scotland. Scottish and English voters, both upset and tired with the way that Westminster politics works, are being set against each other by this sort of rhetoric – whereas actually they share a common cause in fixing an unrepresentative governmental system that purports to make laws on the behalf of people who didn’t vote for them in the first place.

Such divisions are distractions, and effective ones at that. In order to maintain the momentum of popular politics that we’ve seen in Scotland recently, it’s of paramount importance to cut through such sentiments and get on with the real job of involving people in projects where they feel – and have – real agency to make a difference for the better. Real politics happens at the grassroots, and amongst the cacophony of theoretical questions about the way forward for Britain post-referendum, a group of single mothers threatened with eviction have occupied an empty estate in the most deprived borough in London. Here is a group of people taking action against a government that is out of touch – against a government that actively demonises and oppresses them. Here is a group of people doing politics.

The issues that the ‘yes’ campaign focused on are still very real, and are still causing very real damage, both in Scotland and in the rest of the UK. Grassroots organisations have been campaigning on them for years – just look at the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, still fighting tirelessly for its cause and the decommissioning of Trident. Grassroots campaigning on issues that matter is real politics; real people power. It doesn’t always feel like you’re making progress, but if there is one thing that we should learn from looking at the over-350 grassroots campaigns that came together under the ‘Yes Scotland’ umbrella, it is that ordinary people raising their voices to imagine a better society can make the establishment run scared.

In order to engage, people need to have a realistic hope that their actions will make a difference. Whether people in Scotland voted yes or no last week, by the end of the campaign, after a flurry of promises from Better Together about change in Scotland’s future, a vote for the status quo was simply not on the ballot. If – dare I say it, when – politicians inevitably fail to live up to their promises, we need to convince people that politics isn’t over. Political engagement goes beyond the ballot box; political engagement is more than the ballot box.

Whilst the referendum may be over, the discussion on the future of the United Kingdom feels somewhat like it’s only just begun. The way forward for political engagement is not going to look the same everywhere– but in order to keep it going, to prevent being crushed by the same-old establishment politics, solidarity across the UK between grassroots movements fighting the establishment has got to be the priority. Attention must be shifted from the ballot box to issues affecting people’s lives today: to food banks, to the bedroom tax, to the scandal of a £100 billion renewal of a defunct nuclear weapons system whilst the NHS is privatised off for being “unaffordable”, to the climate change that threatens the future of all humanity. Fantastic campaigns already exist on all these issues – whether we can channel the political energies now surging through the UK into action on creating a better future will be the test, though.

Whether you choose to engage in these issues through traditional party-political means or whether you opt out of the system entirely is up to you. But let’s take inspiration from this referendum, whichever side of the vote you wanted to win, and remember what it feels like to actually believe that people, not politics, can make a difference. Let’s reclaim power from the detached elite – and fight for a better future.

#YesScotland: 5 Ways to Continue the Fight

Originally published on Novara Media on September 22 2014.

The day after the referendum, walking to university after two hours’ sleep, I was glum. I’d campaigned for independence and I’d been disappointed. Edinburgh was full of rainy pathetic fallacy and I passed people openly weeping in the streets. It was grim. On my way back home later that day, I saw some ‘yes’ posters in somebody’s window which had been added to over the morning. Silently, defiantly: ‘still yes’.

It would easy to look back at the campaign for Scottish independence and be filled with anger at Westminster and their empty devolution promises, lies and scare tactics, and be upset and pessimistic about the future now that the visions we all spent the last two years thinking, talking, and campaigning about aren’t going to come to light. However, there was always going to be life beyond the referendum, and yes or no, visions of the future aren’t much good when practical action doesn’t follow. Yes – we lost. But what we have won is an incredibly politically engaged population across Scotland, many of whom for the first time in their lives have felt like fighting for a better society might actually make a difference. And that is something we cannot afford to lose.
So rather than looking back, I want to look forward, and here are my top five recommendations for continuing the fight for a better society.

1. Maintain solidarity.

I can’t say this enough. One of the most amazing things to come out of the yes campaign was the conversations and bonds formed between people from vastly different socio-economic backgrounds and walks of life. From people who do quite well under neoliberal capitalist patriarchy to those right at the bottom of the pile, the project of imagining a future Scotland where all could prosper gave people who would normally never cross paths a common cause to unite around. Just because the referendum is over doesn’t mean that there isn’t more to do – political engagement goes beyond a lost vote. Whilst the temptation may be to concentrate on how to continue the independence campaign, the most disadvantaged areas of the country (not coincidently, the areas which did vote yes to independence) are suffering austerity, cuts and oppression. Working with these communities to maintain political engagement in a practical way is of paramount importance now, from encouraging workplace organisation to fighting cuts to essential services for women and parents. Continuing to learn how to stand in solidarity without crushing the voices we are trying to elevate must take priority as we move forward.

2. Focus on the issues.

Most of Scotland, myself included, probably never wants to hear the phrase “currency union” again. But many of the other issues debated on throughout the referendum remain keenly relevant, both in Scotland and beyond. Now that the referendum is over, issue-based campaigning on food banks, Trident, climate change, austerity and so on can continue anew; refreshed, because people have dared to imagine a society where these issues no longer exist. They don’t go away because the independence question has gone away (for the time being) – and a revived energy from people who now know what it feels like to believe they can change the future is exactly what many of these long-standing campaigns need.

3. Keep young people engaged and active.

71% of 16 and 17-year olds voted for an independent Scotland, which means that almost three-quarters of the 16 and 17 year olds in Scotland have just witnessed their dreams of a better future snatched away from them predominantly by the voting habits of older generations. This referendum was the first opportunity the UK has ever given people aged 16 to have a democratic say over their own future, and they have proved that they should not be patronised by ‘adults’ who believe that young people cannot be trusted to handle politics. The defeat felt by many teenagers in Scotland right now is crushing: keeping young people engaged, treating them with respect and allowing them to keep having a say in their own future is the only way we can ensure we don’t end up with a generation lost to a pessimistic apathy.

4. Form new alliances.

Yes, there are a lot of angry and upset yes voters in Scotland right now. But there are also a lot of no voters who are already watching in horror as Westminster reneges on its last-minute devolution promises. No longer having to split people into two camps is not a bad thing, and I would personally be wary of any movement that tries to maintain a division between groups of the population depending on how they voted on 18 September. Since the referendum, there has been no shortage of writing from throughout the UK on the broken state of the Union and Westminster-based politics. People across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are calling for more control over their lives and their futures. New alliances can be formed between grassroots activists challenging the status quo, and in a post-referendum society this is only going to be easier. Leave behind the grudges – show people that the fight can continue, and it can benefit everybody.

5. Don’t give up or give in.

When was the last time you can remember that an entire nation was engaged with political debate, and people felt like they had the right to comment on issues and envisage a better society no matter what their background was? When was the last time that the Westminster establishment ran so scared that Gordon Brown was forced to help out a struggling David Cameron? When was the last time that people really felt like they might be able to stick it to the power?

We can still do this – we can still make them run – and the yes campaign has shown that the way to achieve this is through grassroots engagement, collaboration across campaign groups, linking up the issues and refusing to give in to lies and scaremongering. We’ve spent the last two years imagining a better Scotland – and we don’t need to live in an independent state to start making it happen.

Why I’m voting Yes

On Thursday 18 September, I’m going to be voting in favour of Scottish independence. In no particular order, a few of my reasons are below – but before that, I want to say something about the Yes campaign.

When I arrived in Scotland a little over a year ago now I wasn’t sure whether I would get that involved, or passionate, about the campaign for Scottish independence. I didn’t know much about it, I had some doubts about whether (as an English person) it was “my place” to get involved, and I didn’t know much about the issues at stake. But the past twelve months have changed all that. I’m not sure how to put into words how amazing it is up here right now. The atmosphere is totally electric. Almost every conversation I overhear is about the referendum. People actually believe that they have the power to change their future. And the Yes campaign has been the cause of that. The Yes campaign has been the one knocking on doors in deprived areas informing people about how to register to vote (the No campaign has had no voter registration drive – makes you wonder whether they actually trust the Scottish people to decide the future of Scotland). The No campaign has the entire power of corporate media, Westminster and the BBC behind it (to the extent that the BBC have actually edited out footage of Alex Salmond giving an answer to questions about the referendum to make it look like he didn’t have the answer – you couldn’t make this shit up). The Yes campaign is made of over 350 independent campaigns on every issue from Trident to food banks, and its grassroots power is evident. It’s a coming-together of people to stand up to vested interests and powers-that-be, and it’s snowballed like nothing I’ve ever seen. Giving people hope, giving them inspiration, giving them something to fight for. The Yes campaign is people saying no to scaremongering, no to governments that don’t represent the people that vote (38 out of the last 68 Westminster governments were ones that were not voted for by Scotland), no to fear. I can’t put into words the atmosphere in Scotland right now. Last night I danced in the sold-out Usher Hall with thousands of Yes activists of all ages and backgrounds and genders and the atmosphere was amazing; the atmosphere was an atmosphere of hope and excitement and possibility; the atmosphere was, finally, after so many years of despair and misrepresentation by politicians, the atmosphere of a people that have united to take their future into their own hands. This has been the most amazing thing to witness – and I’m so proud to have been a part of it.

I’m voting Yes on Thursday.

I’m voting Yes because I don’t believe that working-class and anti-capitalist solidarity is contained by borders. A Yes vote is not a vote to leave the rest of the UK to its fate. A Yes vote is proof of people power in the face of corporate- and state-sponsored propaganda. A Yes vote is proof that grassroots movements can actually make a difference, and that ordinary citizens can stand up to take on vested interests, and win. I’ve marched in solidarity with Palestinians, with the victims of global austerity, with people affected by climate change around the world – this isn’t going to change in the event of Scottish independence. It’s going to be a source of inspiration around the world. My hope would be that a yes vote will inspire people who have been oppressed and downtrodden by the ConDem’s austerity throughout the rest of the UK to use Scotland as an example and get involved, get active, and fight for a better future.

I’m voting Yes because an independent Scotland has the power to force the UK’s hand when it comes to Trident – and refusing to host Trident on Scottish soil will almost certainly be the final push that Westminster needs to give in to international pressure to get rid of its outdated, useless weapon of mass destruction.

I’m voting Yes because Scotland has the potential to be a world leader on fighting climate change, and the volume of the Green Yes voices across the country is high, and they have the potential to influence policy and the outcome of a constitution that could enshrine protection of the environment and commitment to a low-carbon future. It’s not about the North Sea oil – it’s not like Westminster offer a radically environmentally-friendly position on the issue. It’s about the potential to create change, and there’s far more of that in the case of independence.

I’m voting Yes because I’m bisexual, and an independent Scotland would enshrine my right to fall in love with who I fall in love with, in a written constitution that homophobic political parties would not have the power to edit at will. The rise of UKIP across the UK and the platform that they’re given to voice homophobic hate speech has cemented this Yes for me: I vote for freedom against persecution, or I vote for the possibility that my rights are going to be crushed.

I’m voting Yes because I don’t think that a Yes vote is the answer. I’m voting Yes because it’s only the beginning – and the chance to actually build a better society, to actually cause a shock to that old boys’ club of Westminster, to show that, sometimes, money and power and scaremongering just isn’t enough to suppress spirit and hope. It’s not going to be easy or smooth. But the status quo isn’t easy or smooth either: just ask somebody depending on food banks, or a victim of the bedroom tax or ATOS tests.

I’m voting Yes. But whatever the result, it’s impossible to deny that something has happened in Scotland. Something powerful. And it’s not something that’s going to go away in a hurry.

Image via National Collective of the Night For Scotland gig on Sunday evening.

This land is your land, this land is my land?

[Originally published at Clarity News]


Only 432 people own half of all Scotland’s private rural land. How did it get like this and what can be done about it?

Walking the West Highland Way recently, a 96-mile trail that stretches from just outside Glasgow to Fort William in the Scottish Highlands, I passed through Tyndrum Community Woodland. I’d be happy to pass through a community-owned woodland anywhere; repairing damaged land, forming healthy ecosystems, providing resilience against future climate change, and land used not for an individual’s profit but for the long-term health of the group of people who live and work in its vicinity. However, in Scotland community ownership is nothing short of revolutionary in a country where the feudal system was only abolished in 2004.

432 people own half of Scotland’s private rural land (private land accounts for almost 90% of land in Scotland), the figure which informs a new report on land reform for the Scottish Affairs Committee in the Westminster Parliament, 432:50. Put another way, 0.025% of the population of Scotland own 67% of the private rural land. Over the past two hundred years, most European countries have introduced reforms to ameliorate similar situations and put some power back in the hands of the people. In Scotland, the situation has remained relatively unchanged until recent years, when the Scottish Government have begun using their powers to introduce incremental reforms.

Interests of private owners of land have had vastly damaging effects on the tenant communities, not to mention the long-term health of the land itself. Instead of their livelihoods and interests being supported, in many cases communities are and have historically been left to struggle. Environmental damage has been exacerbated by the introduction of vast numbers of sheep, who eat the shoots of any small trees before they have a chance to grow. This problem has deep historical roots in the Highland Clearances – but the attitudes underpinning the Clearances still exist today.

The Highland Clearances were the emptying out of the Scottish Highlands and Islands of people to make room for the landed gentry’s grouse-shooting excursions and the sheep which brought more profit than the humans. For the century between 1760 and 1860, inhabitants of the Highlands, Western Isles and beyond were forced increasingly to leave their homes as land owners began renting out the land to sheep grazing and farmers from the Lowlands and England. Any resistance to the forced evictions were met with armed response; many Highlanders died, or were forced overseas by the policy. As others were forced onto increasingly small areas of wasteland from which they were expected to subside, undernourishment and disease took hold. If you visit the Isle of Skye today, you can still see the imprints of this subsistence farming on the land – but the population of the countryside has never recovered (Tusdale glen population is currently under half what it was before the Clearances almost three hundred years ago).

Walking across Rannoch Moor, the largest uninhabited area in Britain (fifty square miles) last week, it would have been easy to delight in the expanse of moorland and plethora of wildlife around me, a land that I could kid myself had been unscarred by human pressures, a wild land left for the environment to flourish in unspoilt bliss. But the ruined cottages that crop up at points along the Drovers’ Path across the moor tell a different story. In a phrase that has stuck with me vividly since I first came across it, the Highlands are not an empty landscape, but an emptied one.

The history of local dispossession by faraway land owners has not been forgotten. Indeed, the figures above would suggest that very little has changed about the situation. Whilst legislation has ensured that a repeat of the Clearances would be illegal now – and one would hope that our society has reached a point where there would no longer be public, royal and governmental support for the armed eviction of tenant farmers – the situation in rural Scotland is still far from ideal. With such a vast amount of land held in private hands for profitable purposes, communities are still forced to live in uncertainties of their futures.

The Isle of Eigg is a prime example. In 1997 the Isle of Eigg Trust, a community group, purchased its own land after support and fundraising from thousands of members of the public. The impact and importance of this event can hardly be exaggerated: citizens standing up to take back control of their own land, their own livelihoods and futures, after years of what the island community have themselves described as “instability, neglect and lack of secure tenure”. This event kickstarted the land reform movement in Scotland. Rather than exist subservient to an absentee laird who nevertheless had the power to change rent prices and terms as and when they saw fit, the communities of Eigg wanted to take back the power over the ground under their feet.

Land reform is a question that goes to the very heart of the issue of people versus profit. Community land ownership in Scotland goes some way to addressing centuries of putting profit before people, to the detriment of lives and livelihoods across the Highlands and Islands. But it has implications far beyond the Scottish borders. In a world where corporate land grabs seem endemic and the privatisation of everything appears to be the direction that British governmental policy is heading, community ownership offers a glimmer of hope for people that would rather be in charge of their own futures than subservient to the wishes of someone else’s profit motives. And when you own the land you depend on for your home and your nourishment, it isn’t a great leap to suggest that concerns over the long-term health and protection of such land against the threat of climate change will take a greater place of priority as well.


Further reading and links:

The Poor Had No Lawyers: Who Owns Scotland, And How They Got It by Andy Wightman – The best introduction out there to the Scottish land situation, tracing the deep and bloody roots of laird land ownership.

Soil and Soul by Alistair McIntosh – The inspiring story of the Isle of Eigg community buy-out and the fight to save a mountain on Harris from destructive mountaintop-removal mining practises.

The Highland Clearances by John Prebble – excellent historical account of the Clearances.

Community Land Scotland:

Making sustainable food affordable

[originally published on Clarity News]

Is there always a trade-off between low prices and eco-friendly food? Can we make sustainable food affordable?

Food has become a key issue for activists and campaigners in recent years, and when you look at the statistics, it’s easy to see why. A new report has found that there has been a 54% increase in the number of meals given to people in food poverty from 2012/13 to 2013/14; in the same time span, there has been an increase of almost 300% in emergency food assistance given by Trussell Trust foodbanks (not to mention numerous food banks run by other organisations).

Around 15 million tonnes of food is wasted every year in the UK alone – which accounts for almost 10% of British greenhouse gas emissions. About 870 million people in the world are severely undernourished, and 1.5 billion are overweight. Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, fishing and forestry have nearly doubled over the past fifty years – the global food system is the single biggest human cause of climate change.

Food is an environmental, social, and economic issue. It’s also something that every human being needs in order to survive.

The tension between food poverty and sustainable systems

However, there is a disconnect in the UK between different kinds of food-related campaigning organisations – a disconnect that stands in the way of effective systemic change. On the one hand, organisations like the Trussell Trust, who have become particularly prominent during the last year and a half due to the unprecedented rise in the number of people needing emergency aid from food banks, provide immediate relief to people in food poverty through, for example, co-ordinating food banks. You could classify these organisations as working on “food poverty and access”.

One the other hand, many organisations throughout the UK are focusing on what could be classified as “healthy and sustainable diets”, for example promoting organic food; campaigns to shop at independent grocery stores; and campaigns to buy only locally-reared, grass-fed meat.

The question, then, is where does the link come in? How do we provide for people in dire need of emergency food aid whilst at the same time creating a system that provides a more sustainable food system for everyone? How do we ensure that “food poverty and access” is not detached from “healthy and sustainable diets”, further entrenching the class divide evident in these issues?

If somebody is in need of assistance from a food bank – or even if they are not at that dire stage, but are on benefits or minimum wage, and have dependents – preaching the evils of 99p packs of sausages and insisting that the person in question must only buy meat directly from the farmer who lives two bus rides away might not win you any supporters.

An interconnected world

However, it is undeniable that climate change is going to change our food system drastically. We are interconnected throughout the world in an unprecedented way, and the same is true of the global food system. In 2008, the effects of Cyclone Nargis on rice production in Myanmar caused a spike in the price of rice, which impacted prices of grains globally due to the imbalance caused in the global food market (financial speculation which treated food as a market commodity was also at play here), leading to foot riots throughout the world and a drastic increase in food insecurity. It is only since the world has become so interconnected that one localised poor harvest could cause such a rippling effect on food prices throughout the world.

In light of this, it becomes clear why one of the key responses to climate change is localising food production and reducing “food miles” – not only does this cut the carbon footprint of food, mitigating the climate impact of the produce, but it also creates a resilience amongst communities where they break free of dependence on the global food system.

If cheap, imported food is therefore unsustainable in the long run, is the opposite also, inevitably, true? Is sustainable food simply never going to be cheap?

The alternatives

Luckily, cheap and sustainable food is not a pipe dream, and there are people and organisations working to create a food system that bridges the gap.

Jack Monroe is one such writer. Ms Monroe rose to fame through her blog, A Girl Called Jack, particularly through documenting how she was able to feed herself and her young son through a period of poverty. Instead of reaching for ready-meals, she would cook more nutritious, and tastier, recipes using basic ingredients. Through the emphasis on nutrition and taste as well as price, Monroe demonstrates that it is perfectly possible to eat well on a tiny budget – but it takes determination to tread the middle ground in the face of bargain-basement ready meals and those with more disposable income whose faces light up in horror at the mere mention of supermarkets.

Another example of such determination comes from the Yorkshire town of Todmorden, home of theIncredible Edible movement. The Incredible Edible premise is simple: “If you eat, you’re in”. Incredible Edible began from the frustration of waiting around for the government to do something about climate change, and the belief that health and community could be transformed through local food projects.

From its outset, Incredible Edible worked on the premise that if the work they were doing was exclusionary to the most disadvantaged members of the community, it would be in vain. This key tenet of the movement meant that whilst the temptation may well have been to create a community growing project suitable only for people with land to grow food on, and the spare time (and money) to participate, Incredible Edible however actually moved beyond this and focused on providing training, education and above all inclusivity in their campaigns.

The future

Food activism should not be about dictating to people the need to eat a diet they simply cannot afford. However, it should also move beyond immediate aid to look at the underlying structural causes of food poverty, the UK’s dependence on a fragile global food system threatened by climate change, and ways to improve health and community in a society where people are increasingly alienated from each other. Food activism should be about building resilient communities in the face of opposition from slow-acting governments and dominant corporate powers.

When we talking about food, what we are talking about is no less than the future of humanity, and bridges between different strands of food activism should reflect this complex and incredibly important vision.

Incredible! Plant Veg, Grow a Revolution

In 2012 I was lucky enough to visit Todmorden, home of Incredible Edible and bastion of hope for people around the world looking for evidence that small changes can make a big difference.

Incredible: Plant Veg, Grow a Revolution is the new book now available to order all about Incredible Edible Todmorden. It’s been a while since I could really describe a book as a “page-turner” but here is a story that truly lives up to that description!

ImageIncredible Edible has been a key movement that I’ve thought back to time and again when the state of our planet gets me down. It’s easy to be depressed about the environment – so easy, in fact, that it’s actually pretty hard to narrow down specific examples as evidence. From the Fijian government’s evacuation and relocation strategies for its islanders faced with rising sea levels (another news source here) to the knowledge that those most responsible for the unprecedented rise in carbon dioxide concentration in our atmosphere will probably suffer the least – and therefore take the least action to curb their emissions – to the fact that the UK government has a climate change-denier responsible for climate change policy, it’s easy to feel like all there is left to do is give up and (literally) wait for the tide to come in.

And that’s when I remember Incredible Edible. Incredible Edible started from the idea that maybe the way to change the world was to stop talking about inaccessible and scary concepts like peak oil and carbon cycles, and start talking about food. Incredible Edible: “If you eat, you’re in”.

ImageThe story of Incredible Edible is one of a depressing and declining Yorkshire market town that turned its future around through the powers of food and community. From its humble beginnings with a sign on a vegetable patch that read “Please help yourself”, to propaganda planting around the town, to a global network of committed individuals working to increase their communities’ health, knowledge, love for food, and future security, Incredible Edible is positive action at its best. And it isn’t elitist, either – one of the things I love most about the project is that from its very outset those involved were convinced that they could only do this by involving the most disadvantaged communities in the area – otherwise, what was the point?

From a vegetable patch outside the police station, to the hospital’s apothecary garden, to the involvement of every local school in growing projects, to new jobs and apprenticeships, Incredible Edible has turned the fortunes of Todmorden around – and created some pretty tasty meals in the process!

ImageReclaiming the right to nutritious and delicious food from the hands of multinational corporations, and building a future with real sustainability at its heart, Incredible Edible is a revolutionary way of life that doesn’t require you to have a PhD in Leninism or twenty years of experience in permaculture. All you need is to be a person who eats food!

There are many things about Incredible: Plant Veg, Grow a Revolution that are going to stick with me and inspire me to keep fighting for a future that’s worth fighting for. But I think one of the main things that I try and carry with me is this: Stop passing the buck. Stop waiting. Don’t wait for permission. Go outside, grow veg, change the world.

ImageIf you are losing hope for the future, if you are losing faith in people, if you are despairing about the future of our planet: stop. Buy Incredible: Plant Veg, Grow a Revolution. And get inspired to stop looking at the failures of those in power, and start changing the world through subverting the structures-that-be to create a kinder and radically more beautiful future for everyone.

Image(All photos taken by myself at the 2012 Todmorden Show).

Kinetic Knowledge


Knowledge is more than text on a page. Whilst I cannot begin to quantify what I have learnt through the last three and a half years of higher education (and whilst I’m eternally thankfully for the fact that I have over a year left before I have to consider leaving the university environment), it is becoming increasingly clear to me that so much of my knowledge and understanding has not come from reading journals or sitting in lectures. In fact, my ability to grasp many concepts I have discussed in the classroom has come from knowledge gained far outside of the walls of the university.

One concept that I have been thinking a lot about recently is that of kinetic knowledge, which, taking various forms, relates to the sensuous and the experiential. Kinetic knowledge, I feel, is knowledge truly earned – knowledge gained directly relevant to time invested in a way that I find harder to measure when looking back on the secondary knowledge gained through reading. It is a sort of knowledge of paramount importance in the study of place, because it is knowledge that relates to an individual’s own relationship to a particular place. Continue reading Kinetic Knowledge

A cautious return to content creation

My stop-start-splutter-halt efforts to write more about the things I think about have failed recently. I’m increasingly wary of a culture which demands that everything must be shared; that there is no purpose in creative output if that output doesn’t create “content” which can be dispersed to interested parties looking for bite-size chunks of intellectual stimuli on a rainy day.

I recently finished A Field Guide to Getting Lost by Rebecca Solnit, a wonderful exploration of different ways of getting lost, different processes of knowing, the importance of the senses, and full of eloquent ideas about the nature of wandering and the self. I turned the final page of the book only to be struck with an advert for the publishing company which informed me that if I visited their website, there was loads more “great content” at my “fingertips”. Actually, content wasn’t what I wanted when I finished this book – I wanted to reflect and process, not ingest more. Continue reading A cautious return to content creation

Gender: A Fun Guide [with presentation/Powerpoint format below]

gender: a fun guide

You can download a version of this comic to use in presentations [strictly not-for-profit only] here.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.